A technical paper or graduate thesis (referred to as paper for the rest of this document) is the explanation of an argument. That is, the purpose of a paper is to explain a theory and illustrate why it is correct or incorrect. We often use the Scientific Method to help our explanation:
Scientific Method [1]
1. Hypothesis
2. Experiment
3. Evaluation and Iteration of Experiment
4. Conclusion
When we write a paper which does not involve an experiment, we would then use other theories or writers to help explain why our hypotheses are true (or false). This is research.
In order to structure the paper, we should remember the famous writing/speaking rule of thumb [2]:
1. Tell them what you are going to say (Introduction).
2. Say it (Body).
3. Tell them what you said (Conclusion).
The general structure of a paper could therefore follow the following outline:
1. Introduction
a. State the Hypothesis
b. Overview of the paper
c. Explain the Conclusion
2. History
a. Explore what past work has occurred on the topic
3. Experiment or Explanation
a. If experimenting, include great detail
b. Evaluate the experiment
c. Iterate if possible
4. Future Work
a. What issues has the work not resolved
5. Conclusion
a. What has been proven
b. Review the paper
6. References
Please use this outline as a guideline. Different instructors will require different methodologies.
Note that the Introduction and Conclusion of the paper should actually be the last sections to be written. The best way to attack the problem is to look at its history first and write this section, then perform the experiment and write up the details. If there is no experiment, write the explanation and research. Finally, write the Future Work, Introduction, and Conclusion.
A Note on Plagiarism
As we are aware, much work has been done in the areas we study, and these results are available in trade magazines, journals, and online. Therefore, it is very tempting to use the words that others have written as part of a paper. However,
PAPERS MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK, AND SO THE USE OF MATERIAL DEVELOPED BY OTHERS IS UNETHICAL AND UNACCEPTABLE.
A paper, or portion of a paper, which is a direct copy of others words will not be accepted by the members of the Computer Science Department and could lead to course failure.
Related to plagiarism is the issue of using the work of others as a source for our arguments. Consider the following quote from the 1976 paper New Directions in Cryptography [3] by Diffie and Hellman:
"We stand today on the brink of a revolution in cryptography. The development of cheap digital hardware has freed it from the
design limitations of mechanical computing and brought the cost of high grade cryptographic devices down to where they can
be used in such commercial applications as remote cash dispensers and computer terminals."
One method for using such a quote in a paper is to proceed as seen above. We place the text in quotes, and if the text consists of multiple lines we indent the text on the right and left. We should also include where we have found this quote as indicated with [3]. This method of quoting should be used sparingly. A paper should not consist of a series of quotes from others.
A second method for using the work of others as a source document is to summarize the information while still indicating that the idea came from the authors. For example, to summarize the Diffie-Hellman quote we could write:
In the 1976 paper New Directions in Cryptography [3], Diffie and Hellman predicted that the world was on the brink of a cryptographic revolution. They indicated that as computer hardware became less expensive and more functional, cryptography would be used in ATM machines and in PCs. We now know that their predictions were correct.
Writing Tips